3 Jesus went into the synagogue again and noticed a man with a deformed hand. 2 Since it was the Sabbath, Jesus’ enemies watched him closely. If he healed the man’s hand, they planned to accuse him of working on the Sabbath.
3 Jesus said to the man with the deformed hand, “Come and stand in front of everyone.” 4 Then he turned to his critics and asked, “Does the law permit good deeds on the Sabbath, or is it a day for doing evil? Is this a day to save life or to destroy it?” But they wouldn’t answer him.
5 He looked around at them angrily and was deeply saddened by their hard hearts. Then he said to the man, “Hold out your hand.” So the man held out his hand, and it was restored! 6 At once the Pharisees went away and met with the supporters of Herod to plot how to kill Jesus.
Mark 3:1-6
Dear God, the part of this story that strikes me today is verse 6. It wasn’t enough for the Pharisees to be upset with Jesus or challenge him. When they ran out of convincing arguments as to why Jesus was dangerous, they decided to partner with the government to increase their authoritarian power. They wanted him dead because they could no longer argue convincingly against Jesus. They were losing the people and instead of either 1.) improving their argument against Jesus or 2.) admit they were wrong and reassess their attitude toward him, they chose door #3: Eliminate him through government power.
There’s a lesson here for us. In my mind, a lot of the Evangelical Church today has lost its ability to articulate and persuasively present its arguments regarding the things it thinks are important [insert your morally questionable activity/attitude here]. So about 40 or 50 years ago it started to seek the power through politics. If it could just get the right laws passed then people would have to see it their way. That would stop this nonsense from happening! And although I’m not saying that liberal ideology is on the side of Jesus, I am saying that the keepers of the faith are no better at arguing against liberal ideology than the Pharisees were against Jesus, so they decided political power over the nonbelievers is the way to go. In my mind, that will only lead to hard hearts on both sides. Door #1 is open to them (persuasion). Door #2 is open to them (admission). They are opting for Door #3, which is power over others.
Father, help me to know how to embrace Door #1 and persuasively argue for your morality in a way that will draw others towards you and not away from you. Help me to be open to consider Door #2 when appropriate. Holy Spirit, counsel me and teach me when I am wrong. And help me to completely reject Door #3. I do not want power over anyone else. I want to simply be their brother in Jesus.
I pray this in Jesus and with your Holy Spirit,
Amen
Luke 19:11-15
11 The crowd was listening to everything Jesus said. And because he was nearing Jerusalem, he told them a story to correct the impression that the Kingdom of God would begin right away. 12 He said, “A nobleman was called away to a distant empire to be crowned king and then return. 13 Before he left, he called together ten of his servants and divided among them ten pounds of silver, saying, ‘Invest this for me while I am gone.’ 14 But his people hated him and sent a delegation after him to say, ‘We do not want him to be our king.’
15 “After he was crowned king, he returned and called in the servants to whom he had given the money. He wanted to find out what their profits were.
Luke 19:11-15
Dear God, I want to spend some time with this parable this morning because I learned something about it yesterday that, if I ever knew it, I had forgotten. Basically, Jesus is comparing himself with Herod for those who are listening. When he said a nobleman went to have himself crowned king and there were people who protested his appointment, he was referencing Herod and how he came to power, but in this case, he was putting himself in the place of Herod and letting them know that 1.) there would be a delay between the present time and what they wanted and 2.) his rule and his edicts would be as final as Herod’s were. To quote the commentary I used this morning: “Jesus is telling a contemporary story in veiled terms. In the parable, the nobleman was given the kingdom and he returned to slay those who didn’t want him in power. A Christians, we believe that Jesus is the King and that in the last days He will return to His Kingdom. Whether you are an atheist, a skeptic, or one who practices any brand of non-Christian religion doesn’t change that reality. Jesus tells us through this parable, “Right now you are free to debate and argue, but when the final curtain is closed, I am Lord!” (Communicator’s Commentary: Luke by Bruce Larson)
I guess this whole thing challenges me because, at some level, I do want to see you as a “pushover God.” I want to put you in my box and have you do what I want you to do and behave how I want you to behave. I don’t want to think of Jesus as exercising authority the way Herod would. I’ve sometimes wondered what it would have been like to be around Jesus a lot like the disciples were. I don’t think I would have liked it. I think I prefer to have the ideas in my head but then make my own rules and live by my own opinions throughout each day. Even though a lot of those rules and opinions are wrong.
Father, I’m not sure exactly what to take from this except to be more in awe of you and more sober about how I interact with you. Even these times of prayer should not be approached lightly. I am address the God of the universe. My God. Can I possibly be as casual as I normally am? I’m sorry for ever treating you as less than you are. You are my God. I am your servant. Thank you for your loving heart towards me.
I pray this in Jesus and with your Holy Spirit,
Amen
Posted by John D. Willome on January 23, 2025 in Luke
Tags: bible, Bruce Larson, christianity, Faith, God, Herod, Jesus, Luke, Parable of the Ten Servants, The Communicator's Commentary