11 When Jesus had finished giving these instructions to his twelve disciples, he went out to teach and preach in towns throughout the region.

² John the Baptist, who was in prison, heard about all the things the Messiah was doing. So he sent his disciples to ask Jesus, ³ “Are you the Messiah we’ve been expecting, or should we keep looking for someone else?”

⁴ Jesus told them, “Go back to John and tell him what you have heard and seen— ⁵ the blind see, the lame walk, those with leprosy are cured, the deaf hear, the dead are raised to life, and the Good News is being preached to the poor.” ⁶ And he added, “God blesses those who do not fall away because of me.”

⁷ As John’s disciples were leaving, Jesus began talking about him to the crowds. “What kind of man did you go into the wilderness to see? Was he a weak reed, swayed by every breath of wind? ⁸ Or were you expecting to see a man dressed in expensive clothes? No, people with expensive clothes live in palaces. ⁹ Were you looking for a prophet? Yes, and he is more than a prophet. ¹⁰ John is the man to whom the Scriptures refer when they say,

‘Look, I am sending my messenger ahead of you,
    and he will prepare your way before you.’

¹¹ “I tell you the truth, of all who have ever lived, none is greater than John the Baptist. Yet even the least person in the Kingdom of Heaven is greater than he is!

Dear God, I guess I’ve never thought of this before, but what does the Jesus narrative look like without John the Baptist? Does John’s presence and prophetic work lend credibility to who Jesus is for the people back then. I think he’s a piece of the story now, but not a critical piece. I think it still reads okay and Jesus has the same legitimacy with or without John, but for people then, I think John certainly helped to give Jesus some credibility.

So what do I think John’s existence adds to the story? Initially, his presence in Elizabeth’s and Zechariah’s lives put them in a position to be an encouragement to Mary when she went to them. Perhaps they were able to advocate for her to her parents.

Then John started stirring the pot with his provocative preaching, challenging everyone from peasants, to Pharisees, to kings. Everyone needed to be challenged, and challenged from a different perspective. Peasants needed to take worship of you seriously. Pharisees needed to look at the spirit of the law and not necessarily the letter–especially the laws they had added themselves. And kings needed to repent of their lust and quest for power.

Is it any different now? Us common folk need to worship you better, repent of our lethargy and how we’ve let sin into our lives, and move into discipleship. There are some pastors who need to look beyond the rules and get to the heart of what is keeping people from you. And kings/presidents/rulers need to repent of their lust and quest for power.

Father, I’ve been uncomfortable while I’ve been typing this because I decided to come to a public place this morning, and I saw a man who appeared to be homeless. I’d gladly have bought him food, but he had just eaten (empty food containers on his table). I thought about talking to him, but I’ve gotten involved with situations like that before, and I’m very aware of the limits an individual has when trying to help someone in that situation. So I remained silent and didn’t talk to him. Did I make the wrong decision. Did I justify selfishness or was I wise? Right now, I’m feeling more justification in my actions than wisdom. So I pray that you will forgive me if you were just here in front of me and I missed you. Even now, though, I’m still not sure what I would have said to him. What words? Maybe start with making eye contact and just saying hello. Yeah, maybe that’s what I should have done at just a basic human level. Yes, Father, Jesus, and Holy Spirit, I am one of the peasants John called on to repent. Help me to be who you are calling me to be.

I pray this in Jesus and with your Holy Spirit,

Amen